2009/11/30

Science vs. religion





I think the theory of evolution is wrong. Proponents of the evolution theory argue that intelligent design is just a story in Genesis and do not have scientific proof, but evolution theory can explain how human being evolved. However, this argument is a paradox. They always use ‘if’, when they explain the theory of evolution. This ‘if’ cannot be scientific explanation. Intelligent design does not use ‘if’, because it is absolutely true. Even though the theory has been revealed shortcoming more and more, intelligent design has been proved by scientific description.


Human cannot know how God think about. A man before God is like an ant before a man. According to evolution theory, we cannot describe how a primordial cell was created in the beginning and the universe should be which it is. Like this, the theory of evolution has lost its reliable. Should we learn the theory in biological class? Of course, opponents to intelligent design are difficult to accept without religious belief, but how long will this incorrect theory learns? Above all, we have a right of learning that we want to learn. In this sense, intelligent design clubs in university do as a pioneer. Because of these clubs, we need not struggle with enforcement of evolution theory in class any longer. They create the club and we will observe that how they design their clubs. I want to learn either intelligent design or evolution theory in biological class or literature class. I think these intelligent clubs make it true.

Which opinion do you believe in?

No comments:

Post a Comment

 

sunjuman Design by Insight © 2009